Instructions
Assess the patient's best response in each category. Select the highest score that the patient achieves for each component. The total GCS score ranges from 3-15, with higher scores indicating better neurological function.
Eye Opening Response
Select the best eye opening response observed
Verbal Response
Select the best verbal response observed
Motor Response
Select the best motor response observed
Glasgow Coma Scale Interpretation
Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) Score
The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) is a neurological scale used to assess a patient's level of consciousness after a brain injury. It evaluates three aspects of responsiveness: eye opening, verbal response, and motor response. Each component is scored from 1-6 (motor), 1-5 (verbal), or 1-4 (eye opening), with a total possible score of 3-15. Lower scores indicate more severe brain injury and worse prognosis.
GCS Components and Scoring
Eye Opening Response (1-4 points)
- 4 points - Spontaneous: Eyes open spontaneously
- 3 points - To Voice: Eyes open to verbal command
- 2 points - To Pain: Eyes open to painful stimulus
- 1 point - None: No eye opening to any stimulus
Verbal Response (1-5 points)
- 5 points - Oriented: Patient is oriented to time, place, and person
- 4 points - Confused: Patient responds but is confused or disoriented
- 3 points - Inappropriate Words: Patient speaks but uses inappropriate words
- 2 points - Incomprehensible Sounds: Patient makes incomprehensible sounds
- 1 point - None: No verbal response
Motor Response (1-6 points)
- 6 points - Obeys Commands: Patient follows verbal commands
- 5 points - Localizes Pain: Patient localizes to painful stimulus
- 4 points - Withdraws from Pain: Patient withdraws from painful stimulus
- 3 points - Flexion to Pain: Patient shows abnormal flexion to pain
- 2 points - Extension to Pain: Patient shows abnormal extension to pain
- 1 point - None: No motor response
Total Score Interpretation
Mild Brain Injury (13-15 points)
- Clinical significance: Patient is alert and responsive
- Prognosis: Generally good with appropriate treatment
- Management: Monitor for deterioration, consider imaging
- Discharge: May be appropriate with reliable follow-up
Moderate Brain Injury (9-12 points)
- Clinical significance: Patient is lethargic or stuporous
- Prognosis: Variable, depends on underlying cause
- Management: Hospital admission, frequent monitoring
- Imaging: CT scan recommended
Severe Brain Injury (3-8 points)
- Clinical significance: Patient is comatose
- Prognosis: Poor, high mortality and morbidity
- Management: ICU admission, airway protection
- Imaging: Immediate CT scan, consider ICP monitoring
Clinical Applications
Emergency Assessment
- Initial evaluation: Rapid assessment of consciousness level
- Serial monitoring: Track changes in neurological status
- Treatment decisions: Guide urgency of interventions
- Prognostic assessment: Predict outcomes and recovery
Trauma Management
- Head injury: Primary assessment tool for TBI
- Multi-trauma: Assess neurological component
- Transport decisions: Guide level of care needed
- Resource allocation: Determine appropriate facility
Important Considerations
Assessment Technique
- Assess best response in each category
- Use standardized painful stimuli (supraorbital pressure, nail bed pressure)
- Document specific responses, not just scores
- Consider pre-existing conditions that may affect assessment
- Assess in quiet environment when possible
Limitations
- May be affected by sedation, paralysis, or intubation
- Does not assess brainstem function
- May not capture subtle changes in consciousness
- Requires training for accurate assessment
- May be difficult in agitated or uncooperative patients
Special Populations
- Intubated patients: Verbal component cannot be assessed
- Paralyzed patients: Motor component cannot be assessed
- Pediatric patients: Modified scales available for children
- Elderly patients: Baseline may be lower
Clinical Pearls
- Always assess GCS serially to monitor for changes
- Document individual component scores, not just total
- Consider GCS trend more important than single values
- Use in conjunction with other neurological assessments
- Be aware of factors that may artificially lower scores
- Consider pupil size and reactivity in addition to GCS
- Document time of assessment and any interventions
Management Recommendations
GCS 13-15 (Mild)
- Monitor for deterioration
- Consider CT scan if high-risk features present
- Discharge with appropriate follow-up
- Provide head injury instructions
GCS 9-12 (Moderate)
- Hospital admission
- Frequent neurological monitoring
- CT scan of head
- Consider neurosurgical consultation
GCS 3-8 (Severe)
- ICU admission
- Airway protection and ventilation
- Immediate CT scan
- Neurosurgical consultation
- Consider ICP monitoring
Prognostic Factors
Favorable Prognosis
- Higher GCS scores (especially motor component)
- Improving GCS over time
- Normal pupil reactivity
- Younger age
- Absence of other injuries
Poor Prognosis
- Low GCS scores (especially motor component)
- Deteriorating GCS
- Abnormal pupil reactivity
- Older age
- Multiple injuries
- Hypotension or hypoxia
This calculator provides a standardized method for assessing consciousness level, which is crucial for initial evaluation, monitoring, and prognostic assessment in patients with altered mental status or brain injury. The GCS is widely used in emergency medicine, neurology, and critical care settings.
References
- Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet. 1974;2(7872):81-84.
- Teasdale G, et al. The Glasgow Coma Scale at 40 years: standing the test of time. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(8):844-854.
- Reilly PL. The value of the Glasgow Coma Scale and injury severity score: predicting outcome in multiple trauma patients with head injury. J Trauma. 1989;29(6):746-748.
- Marmarou A, et al. Prognostic value of the Glasgow Coma Scale and pupil reactivity in traumatic brain injury assessed pre-hospital and on enrollment: an IMPACT analysis. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24(2):270-280.
- Stocchetti N, et al. Severe traumatic brain injury: targeted management in the intensive care unit. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16(6):452-464.
Loading PDF...