Instructions
Enter the patient's systolic and diastolic blood pressure readings to calculate the Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP). MAP represents the average arterial pressure during one cardiac cycle and is a key indicator of tissue perfusion.
Systolic Blood Pressure
Enter the systolic blood pressure reading
mmHg
Diastolic Blood Pressure
Enter the diastolic blood pressure reading
mmHg
Mean Arterial Pressure Interpretation
< 60 mmHg: Low MAP - Inadequate tissue perfusion
60-100 mmHg: Normal MAP - Adequate tissue perfusion
100-130 mmHg: Elevated MAP - Monitor for end-organ damage
> 130 mmHg: High MAP - Increased cardiovascular risk
Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) Calculator
The Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) is a calculated value that represents the average arterial pressure during one cardiac cycle. It is a key indicator of tissue perfusion and is used in critical care, anesthesia, and emergency medicine to assess cardiovascular status and guide treatment decisions.
MAP Formula
Or equivalently:
Physiological Basis
The MAP formula accounts for the fact that the heart spends more time in diastole than systole during each cardiac cycle. Since blood flow to tissues occurs throughout the cardiac cycle, the diastolic pressure contributes more to the average arterial pressure than the systolic pressure.
MAP Interpretation
Low MAP (< 60 mmHg)
- Clinical significance: Inadequate tissue perfusion
- Common causes:
- Hypovolemic shock (hemorrhage, dehydration)
- Cardiogenic shock (heart failure, myocardial infarction)
- Distributive shock (sepsis, anaphylaxis, neurogenic)
- Obstructive shock (pulmonary embolism, cardiac tamponade)
- Clinical manifestations: Altered mental status, decreased urine output, cool extremities, lactic acidosis
- Management: Immediate fluid resuscitation, vasopressors if needed, treat underlying cause
Normal MAP (60-100 mmHg)
- Clinical significance: Adequate tissue perfusion
- Management: Continue monitoring, maintain current therapy
- Target range: Most clinical scenarios aim for MAP ≥ 65 mmHg
Elevated MAP (100-130 mmHg)
- Clinical significance: Monitor for end-organ damage
- Common causes:
- Essential hypertension
- Secondary hypertension (renal, endocrine, vascular)
- Medications (corticosteroids, NSAIDs, decongestants)
- Stress, pain, anxiety
- Management: Lifestyle modifications, antihypertensive therapy if indicated
High MAP (> 130 mmHg)
- Clinical significance: Increased risk of end-organ damage
- Complications:
- Cardiovascular: Left ventricular hypertrophy, heart failure, coronary artery disease
- Cerebrovascular: Stroke, cognitive impairment
- Renal: Chronic kidney disease, proteinuria
- Ocular: Retinopathy, vision loss
- Management: Aggressive antihypertensive therapy, close monitoring
Clinical Applications
Critical Care
- Shock management: Target MAP ≥ 65 mmHg in most shock states
- Sepsis: MAP ≥ 65 mmHg is a key resuscitation target
- Trauma: Maintain adequate perfusion during resuscitation
- Post-operative care: Monitor for hypotension or hypertension
Anesthesia
- Intraoperative monitoring: Maintain adequate tissue perfusion
- Post-anesthetic care: Monitor for hypotension
- Regional anesthesia: Assess sympathetic blockade effects
Emergency Medicine
- Hypertensive emergencies: Assess end-organ perfusion
- Cardiac arrest: Guide resuscitation efforts
- Trauma assessment: Evaluate circulatory status
Important Considerations
Limitations
- Does not account for pulse pressure (difference between systolic and diastolic)
- May not reflect true tissue perfusion in all situations
- Assumes normal arterial compliance
- May be misleading in patients with stiff arteries (elderly, atherosclerosis)
- Does not consider regional blood flow distribution
Special Populations
- Elderly patients: May have higher MAP targets due to stiff arteries
- Chronic hypertension: May need higher MAP to maintain perfusion
- Pregnancy: MAP naturally decreases in second trimester
- Children: Different normal ranges by age
Clinical Pearls
- MAP ≥ 65 mmHg is the target in most shock states
- Consider individual patient factors when interpreting MAP
- Monitor trends over time, not just single values
- Use in conjunction with other hemodynamic parameters
- Consider end-organ perfusion signs (mental status, urine output, skin perfusion)
- Document MAP values in medical records for tracking
- Reassess if clinical picture doesn't match MAP values
Treatment Guidelines
Low MAP Management
- Fluid resuscitation: Crystalloids or colloids as appropriate
- Vasopressors: Norepinephrine, vasopressin, epinephrine
- Inotropes: Dobutamine, milrinone for cardiogenic shock
- Treat underlying cause: Source control in sepsis, hemostasis in hemorrhage
High MAP Management
- Lifestyle modifications: Diet, exercise, weight loss, smoking cessation
- Antihypertensive therapy: ACE inhibitors, ARBs, CCBs, thiazides
- Hypertensive emergency: IV antihypertensives (labetalol, nicardipine, nitroprusside)
- End-organ protection: Statins, antiplatelet therapy as indicated
Monitoring Recommendations
Frequency of Monitoring
- Critical care: Continuous or every 5-15 minutes
- Post-operative: Every 1-4 hours initially
- Hypertension: Daily to weekly depending on severity
- Routine care: At each visit
Additional Monitoring
- Heart rate and rhythm
- Pulse pressure
- End-organ perfusion signs
- Laboratory values (lactate, creatinine, troponin)
- Imaging as indicated
This calculator provides a standardized method for calculating MAP, which is essential for assessing tissue perfusion, guiding resuscitation efforts, and managing hypertensive states. MAP is widely used in critical care, emergency medicine, and anesthesia practice.
References
- Magder S. The meaning of blood pressure. Crit Care. 2018;22(1):257.
- Vincent JL, et al. Mean arterial pressure: not just a number. Crit Care. 2017;21(Suppl 3):S2.
- Asfar P, et al. High versus low blood-pressure target in patients with septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(17):1583-1593.
- Dellinger RP, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(2):580-637.
- Rhodes A, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(3):304-377.
Loading PDF...