Patient's age in years (1 point per year)
Male gender (+10 points)
Cancer
+30Active cancer (treatment within 6 months, palliative, or metastatic)
Heart failure
+10Chronic heart failure
Chronic lung disease
+10Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Pulse ≥ 110/min
+20Heart rate ≥ 110 beats per minute
Systolic BP < 100 mmHg
+30Systolic blood pressure < 100 mmHg
Respiratory rate > 30/min
+20Respiratory rate > 30 breaths per minute
Temperature < 36°C
+20Body temperature < 36°C (96.8°F)
Altered mental status
+60Confusion, disorientation, or lethargy
Oxygen saturation < 90%
+20Arterial oxygen saturation < 90%
Risk Stratification
- Class I (≤65 points): Very low risk (0-1.6% mortality) - Consider outpatient treatment
- Class II (66-85 points): Low risk (1.7-3.5% mortality) - Consider outpatient treatment
- Class III (86-105 points): Intermediate risk (3.2-7.1% mortality) - Consider hospital admission
- Class IV (106-125 points): High risk (4.0-11.4% mortality) - Hospital admission recommended
- Class V (>125 points): Very high risk (10.0-24.5% mortality) - Hospital admission required
Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) Score Calculator
The Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) is a validated clinical prediction rule for assessing the severity of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) and predicting 30-day mortality risk. It helps guide decisions regarding hospital admission, outpatient treatment, and level of care.
Components of PESI
The PESI score is calculated by assigning points for each of the following 11 variables:
- Age: 1 point per year of age
- Male sex: +10 points
- Cancer: +30 points (active cancer within 6 months, palliative, or metastatic)
- Heart failure: +10 points (chronic heart failure)
- Chronic lung disease: +10 points (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease)
- Pulse ≥ 110/min: +20 points
- Systolic BP < 100 mmHg: +30 points
- Respiratory rate > 30/min: +20 points
- Temperature < 36°C: +20 points
- Altered mental status: +60 points (confusion, disorientation, lethargy)
- Oxygen saturation < 90%: +20 points
Risk Stratification
Class I (≤65 points) - Very Low Risk
- 30-day mortality: 0-1.6%
- Recommendation: Consider outpatient treatment
- Clinical features: Hemodynamically stable, no right ventricular dysfunction
Class II (66-85 points) - Low Risk
- 30-day mortality: 1.7-3.5%
- Recommendation: Consider outpatient treatment
- Clinical features: Generally stable, may have minor comorbidities
Class III (86-105 points) - Intermediate Risk
- 30-day mortality: 3.2-7.1%
- Recommendation: Consider hospital admission
- Clinical features: May have signs of right ventricular dysfunction
Class IV (106-125 points) - High Risk
- 30-day mortality: 4.0-11.4%
- Recommendation: Hospital admission recommended
- Clinical features: Significant comorbidities, hemodynamic compromise
Class V (>125 points) - Very High Risk
- 30-day mortality: 10.0-24.5%
- Recommendation: Hospital admission required, consider ICU
- Clinical features: Hemodynamic instability, severe comorbidities
Clinical Applications
Outpatient vs. Inpatient Decision
- Low risk (Class I-II): Generally safe for outpatient treatment with appropriate follow-up
- Intermediate risk (Class III): Consider hospital admission, especially if comorbidities present
- High risk (Class IV-V): Hospital admission recommended, consider ICU for Class V
Treatment Considerations
- Anticoagulation: All patients require anticoagulation regardless of risk class
- Thrombolysis: Consider for hemodynamically unstable patients (Class V)
- Monitoring: Higher classes require closer monitoring
- Follow-up: More frequent follow-up for higher risk classes
Important Considerations
Limitations
- Not validated for subsegmental PE
- May underestimate risk in patients with massive PE
- Does not account for social factors or access to care
- Should be used in conjunction with clinical judgment
- Not a substitute for hemodynamic assessment
Additional Factors to Consider
- Right ventricular function: Assess with echocardiography or CT
- Troponin levels: Elevated troponin indicates myocardial injury
- BNP/NT-proBNP: Elevated levels suggest right ventricular strain
- Social factors: Access to care, compliance, support systems
- Comorbidities: Renal failure, liver disease, bleeding risk
Comparison with Other Scores
PESI vs. sPESI (Simplified PESI)
- PESI: More complex but more accurate
- sPESI: Simpler, easier to calculate at bedside
- Clinical use: sPESI preferred for rapid assessment
PESI vs. HESTIA Criteria
- PESI: Prognostic tool for mortality prediction
- HESTIA: Decision tool for outpatient treatment
- Clinical use: Can be used together for comprehensive assessment
Clinical Pearls
- Always use clinical judgment in addition to the score
- Consider patient preferences and social circumstances
- Monitor for clinical deterioration regardless of initial score
- Reassess severity if patient condition changes
- Use in conjunction with imaging findings and laboratory results
- Consider right ventricular assessment in intermediate-high risk patients
This calculator provides a validated method for assessing PE severity and guiding treatment decisions. The PESI score is widely used in clinical practice and has been validated in multiple populations and settings.
References
- Aujesky, D., Obrosky, D. S., Stone, R. A., Auble, T. E., Perrier, A., Cornuz, J., ... & Fine, M. J. (2005). Derivation and validation of a prognostic model for pulmonary embolism. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 172(8), 1041-1046.
- Jiménez, D., Aujesky, D., Moores, L., Gómez, V., Lobo, J. L., Uresandi, F., ... & Yusen, R. D. (2010). Simplification of the pulmonary embolism severity index for prognostication in patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism. Archives of Internal Medicine, 170(15), 1383-1389.
- Kearon, C., Akl, E. A., Ornelas, J., Blaivas, A., Jimenez, D., Bounameaux, H., ... & Moores, L. (2016). Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: CHEST guideline and expert panel report. Chest, 149(2), 315-352.
- Konstantinides, S. V., Meyer, G., Becattini, C., Bueno, H., Geersing, G. J., Harjola, V. P., ... & Zamorano, J. L. (2020). 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS). European Heart Journal, 41(4), 543-603.
- Righini, M., Roy, P. M., Meyer, G., Verschuren, F., Aujesky, D., & Le Gal, G. (2006). The Simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI): validation of a clinical prognostic model for pulmonary embolism. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 4(4), 744-749.
Loading PDF...