SAMe-TT₂R₂ Score
Assesses warfarin control and predicts Time in Therapeutic Range (TTR). Score ≥2 suggests poor warfarin control and may indicate need for alternative anticoagulants.
Sex
+0Patient's sex
Age < 60 years
+1Patient is younger than 60 years
Medical history
+1More than 2 comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, heart failure, previous stroke, pulmonary disease, hepatic or renal disease)
Treatment (interacting drugs)
+1Use of amiodarone, for example
Tobacco use
+2Current tobacco use (within 2 years)
Race (non-Caucasian)
+2Patient is non-Caucasian
SAMe-TT₂R₂ Score
The SAMe-TT₂R₂ Score is a validated tool used to predict the quality of anticoagulation control with warfarin therapy, specifically the Time in Therapeutic Range (TTR). This score helps clinicians identify patients who may have difficulty maintaining therapeutic INR levels and guides decisions about anticoagulation strategy.
Scoring Criteria
The SAMe-TT₂R₂ Score assigns points based on patient characteristics that affect warfarin control:
Risk Factor | Points |
---|---|
Sex (Female) | +1 |
Age < 60 years | +1 |
Medical history (≥2 comorbidities) | +1 |
Treatment (interacting drugs) | +1 |
Tobacco use (within 2 years) | +2 |
Race (non-Caucasian) | +2 |
Risk Stratification and Expected TTR
Score | Risk Level | Expected TTR | Clinical Implication |
---|---|---|---|
0-1 | Low | 72.8% | Good warfarin control expected |
2 | Medium | 66.2% | Moderate warfarin control |
≥3 | High | 58.0% | Poor warfarin control expected |
Time in Therapeutic Range (TTR) Calculation
TTR is calculated using the Rosendaal method, which provides a linear interpolation of INR values:
For atrial fibrillation, the therapeutic INR range is typically 2.0-3.0.
Clinical Application and Management
The SAMe-TT₂R₂ Score helps guide anticoagulation decisions:
- Low Risk (0-1 points):
- Expected TTR: 72.8%
- Standard warfarin management is likely to be effective
- Routine INR monitoring is appropriate
- Medium Risk (2 points):
- Expected TTR: 66.2%
- Consider more frequent INR monitoring
- Enhanced patient education and adherence strategies
- Consider warfarin management clinics
- High Risk (≥3 points):
- Expected TTR: 58.0%
- Consider alternative anticoagulants (DOACs)
- If warfarin is continued, intensive management required
- Frequent INR monitoring and dose adjustments
- Consider specialized anticoagulation clinics
Comparison with DOACs
For patients with high SAMe-TT₂R₂ scores (≥3), DOACs may be preferred:
- Advantages of DOACs in high-risk patients:
- No need for INR monitoring
- Fewer drug interactions
- More predictable pharmacokinetics
- Better adherence potential
- Considerations:
- Cost and insurance coverage
- Renal function (affects DOAC dosing)
- Patient preference
- Contraindications to DOACs
Important Considerations
The SAMe-TT₂R₂ Score should be used as part of a comprehensive clinical assessment:
- It is specifically validated for atrial fibrillation patients
- The score predicts TTR but does not guarantee outcomes
- Individual patient factors may influence decision-making
- Regular reassessment may be needed as patient factors change
- Consider patient preferences and values in shared decision-making
- Follow institutional protocols and guidelines
Validation and Performance
The SAMe-TT₂R₂ Score has been extensively validated:
- Discrimination: Good ability to distinguish between patients with good vs. poor warfarin control
- Calibration: Well-calibrated across different populations
- External validation: Validated in multiple cohorts
- Clinical utility: Shown to improve anticoagulation decision-making
This tool has been widely adopted in clinical practice and is recommended by major guidelines for anticoagulation management in atrial fibrillation.
References
- Apostolakis S, Sullivan RM, Olshansky B, Lip GY. Factors affecting quality of anticoagulation control among patients with atrial fibrillation on warfarin: the SAMe-TT₂R₂ score. Chest. 2013;144(5):1555-1563.
- Lip GY, Nieuwlaat R, Pisters R, Lane DA, Crijns HJ. Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation. Chest. 2010;137(2):263-272.
- January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H, et al. 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(1):104-132.
Loading PDF...