Wells Criteria for Pulmonary Embolism
Select all criteria that apply to the patient. A score ≥ 2 suggests moderate to high probability of PE.
Clinical signs and symptoms of DVT
+3Leg swelling, pain with palpation of the deep veins
Alternative diagnosis less likely than PE
+3No other diagnosis that explains the symptoms as well as PE
Heart rate > 100 beats per minute
+1.5Tachycardia on presentation
Immobilization or surgery in the previous 6 weeks
+1.5Bed rest ≥ 3 days or major surgery requiring general/regional anesthesia
Previous DVT or PE
+1.5History of documented deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism
Hemoptysis
+1Coughing up blood
Malignancy
+1Active cancer (treatment ongoing, within 6 months, or palliative)
Clinical Notes:
- • Score < 2: Low probability (1.3% prevalence)
- • Score 2-6: Moderate probability (16.2% prevalence)
- • Score > 6: High probability (37.5% prevalence)
- • D-dimer testing is most useful in low and moderate probability cases
- • High probability cases may proceed directly to imaging
Wells Criteria for Pulmonary Embolism
The Wells Criteria for Pulmonary Embolism is a validated clinical prediction rule used to assess the probability of pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of PE. This tool helps clinicians make informed decisions about diagnostic testing and treatment strategies.
Scoring Criteria
The Wells Criteria assigns points based on clinical features and risk factors:
Clinical Feature | Points |
---|---|
Clinical signs and symptoms of DVT | +3.0 |
Alternative diagnosis less likely than PE | +3.0 |
Heart rate > 100 beats per minute | +1.5 |
Immobilization or surgery in the previous 6 weeks | +1.5 |
Previous DVT or PE | +1.5 |
Hemoptysis | +1.0 |
Malignancy (treatment ongoing, within 6 months, or palliative) | +1.0 |
Probability Stratification
Score | Probability | Prevalence of PE |
---|---|---|
< 2.0 | Low | 1.3% |
2.0 - 6.0 | Moderate | 16.2% |
> 6.0 | High | 37.5% |
Clinical Application and Management
The Wells Criteria helps guide diagnostic strategies:
- Low Probability (< 2 points):
- Consider D-dimer testing first
- If D-dimer is negative, PE can be safely ruled out
- If D-dimer is positive, consider imaging studies
- Moderate Probability (2-6 points):
- Consider D-dimer testing and/or imaging studies
- CT pulmonary angiogram or V/Q scan may be appropriate
- Clinical judgment should guide the diagnostic approach
- High Probability (> 6 points):
- Consider immediate imaging studies
- D-dimer testing may not be necessary
- High clinical suspicion warrants prompt evaluation
Important Considerations
The Wells Criteria should be used as part of a comprehensive clinical assessment:
- It is most useful when combined with other clinical information
- The score helps reduce unnecessary imaging in low-probability cases
- It should not replace clinical judgment in high-risk situations
- Consider patient-specific factors that may not be captured by the score
This tool has been extensively validated and is widely used in emergency departments and other acute care settings to help manage patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.
References
- Wells, P. S., Anderson, D. R., Rodger, M., Ginsberg, J. S., Kearon, C., Gent, M., ... & Kovacs, M. J. (2000). Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer. Thrombosis and haemostasis, 83(3), 416-420.
- Wells, P. S., Anderson, D. R., Rodger, M., Stiell, I., Dreyer, J. F., Barnes, D., ... & Kovacs, M. J. (2001). Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside without diagnostic imaging: management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism presenting to the emergency department by using a simple clinical model and D-dimer. Annals of internal medicine, 135(2), 98-107.
- Le Gal, G., Righini, M., Roy, P. M., Sanchez, O., Aujesky, D., Bounameaux, H., & Perrier, A. (2006). Prediction of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: the revised Geneva score. Annals of internal medicine, 144(3), 165-171.
- Kearon, C., Akl, E. A., Comerota, A. J., Prandoni, P., Bounameaux, H., Goldhaber, S. Z., ... & Kahn, S. R. (2012). Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest, 141(2_suppl), e419S-e496S.
Loading PDF...