Geneva Score for Pulmonary Embolism
Select all criteria that apply to the patient. A score ≥ 4 suggests intermediate to high probability of PE.
Age > 65 years
+1Patient is older than 65 years
Previous DVT or PE
+3History of documented deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism
Surgery or fracture within 1 month
+2Major surgery or fracture requiring immobilization in the past month
Active malignancy
+2Active cancer (treatment ongoing, within 6 months, or palliative)
Unilateral lower limb pain
+3Pain in one lower extremity
Hemoptysis
+2Coughing up blood
Pain on lower limb deep venous palpation and unilateral edema
+4Tenderness on deep venous palpation with swelling in one leg
Heart Rate
+0Patient's heart rate on presentation
Clinical Notes:
- • Score 0-3: Low probability (8% prevalence)
- • Score 4-10: Intermediate probability (28% prevalence)
- • Score ≥ 11: High probability (74% prevalence)
- • More objective than Wells Criteria - less dependent on clinical judgment
- • D-dimer testing is most useful in low and moderate probability cases
Geneva Score for Pulmonary Embolism
The Geneva Score is a validated clinical prediction rule used to assess the probability of pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of PE. This score provides an alternative to the Wells Criteria and is particularly useful in emergency department settings.
Scoring Criteria
The Geneva Score assigns points based on clinical features and risk factors:
Clinical Feature | Points |
---|---|
Age > 65 years | +1 |
Previous DVT or PE | +3 |
Surgery or fracture within 1 month | +2 |
Active malignancy | +2 |
Unilateral lower limb pain | +3 |
Hemoptysis | +2 |
Heart rate 75-94 bpm | +3 |
Heart rate ≥ 95 bpm | +5 |
Pain on lower limb deep venous palpation and unilateral edema | +4 |
Probability Stratification
Score | Probability | Prevalence of PE |
---|---|---|
0-3 | Low | 8% |
4-10 | Intermediate | 28% |
≥ 11 | High | 74% |
Clinical Application and Management
The Geneva Score helps guide diagnostic strategies:
- Low Probability (0-3 points):
- Consider D-dimer testing first
- If D-dimer is negative, PE can be safely ruled out
- If D-dimer is positive, consider imaging studies
- Intermediate Probability (4-10 points):
- Consider D-dimer testing and/or imaging studies
- CT pulmonary angiogram or V/Q scan may be appropriate
- Clinical judgment should guide the diagnostic approach
- High Probability (≥ 11 points):
- Consider immediate imaging studies
- D-dimer testing may not be necessary
- High clinical suspicion warrants prompt evaluation
Comparison with Wells Criteria
The Geneva Score offers several advantages:
- Objective criteria: Less dependent on clinical judgment compared to Wells Criteria
- Reproducible: More standardized scoring system
- Validated: Extensively validated in multiple studies
- Emergency department friendly: Designed for rapid assessment
Important Considerations
The Geneva Score should be used as part of a comprehensive clinical assessment:
- It is most useful when combined with other clinical information
- The score helps reduce unnecessary imaging in low-probability cases
- It should not replace clinical judgment in high-risk situations
- Consider patient-specific factors that may not be captured by the score
- Age-adjusted D-dimer cutoffs may be more appropriate in certain populations
This tool has been extensively validated and is widely used in emergency departments and other acute care settings to help manage patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.
References
- Le Gal, G., Righini, M., Roy, P. M., Sanchez, O., Aujesky, D., Bounameaux, H., & Perrier, A. (2006). Prediction of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: the revised Geneva score. Annals of internal medicine, 144(3), 165-171.
- Wells, P. S., Anderson, D. R., Rodger, M., Ginsberg, J. S., Kearon, C., Gent, M., ... & Kovacs, M. J. (2000). Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer. Thrombosis and haemostasis, 83(3), 416-420.
- Kearon, C., Akl, E. A., Comerota, A. J., Prandoni, P., Bounameaux, H., Goldhaber, S. Z., ... & Kahn, S. R. (2012). Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest, 141(2_suppl), e419S-e496S.
- Righini, M., Van Es, J., Den Exter, P. L., Roy, P. M., Verschuren, F., Ghuysen, A., ... & Le Gal, G. (2014). Age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels to rule out pulmonary embolism: the ADJUST-PE study. JAMA, 311(11), 1117-1124.
Please fill in all the required fields to see the result.